Re: [boost] [CMake] what to do now?

14 Apr 2016

      On 2016-04-15 01:09, Edward Diener wrote:
...
On 4/14/2016 5:17 PM, Andrey Semashev wrote:
...
On 2016-04-14 22:00, Edward Diener wrote:
...
On 4/14/2016 1:37 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
...
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Louis Dionne 
wrote:
...
Don't overthink it. All I'm saying is that the Boost guidelines
recommend
that
CMakeLists.txt should appear in $some_library/build/CMakeLists.txt,
while I
argue that current practice is to put it in
$some_library/CMakeLists.txt.
Just to be clear. It's not a recommendation. It's a requirement.
Ideally could not one have a CMakeLists.txt file wherever there is
currently a jamfile ? In the library's 'build' directory to build a
non-header only library, in the library's 'doc' directory to build the
docs, in the library's 'test' directory to run the tests etc.
Yes, that is possible and what should be done according to the current
guidelines. It's just not how it's typically done in other projects that
use cmake.
That appears to be a minus for CMake. The build of a library is in my
mind the summation of the build of its separate parts. Being able to
build each part of a library ( the library itself, documentation, tests,
examples etc etc. ) separately must be more flexible than having to
build every part as a whole. In that respect Boost.Build has got it
right IMO.
I think you misunderstood me. You can build sources, docs and tests 
separately. You can place CMakeLists.txt at the places where Jamfiles 
currently are. Each of these CMakeLists.txt would declare their own 
project and could be independent from others.

However, the common practice is a bit different. There is typically a 
single root CMakeLists.txt, which defines a project and then includes a 
number of nested CMakeLists.txt. The nested CMakeLists.txt may or may 
not define their projects, that doesn't really matter if you invoke 
cmake with the root CMakeLists.txt because you're generating makefiles 
for the whole tree in this case. You can also build targets selectively 
in this case.