2 May
2007
2 May
'07
12:37 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
on Tue May 01 2007, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov-AT-mmltd.net> wrote:
Jeff Garland wrote:
BTW, I don't know if this has been discussed much, but the plan for subversion switchover, as I understand it, is to take 1.34 as the svn HEAD and force all work unstable stuff on the CVS HEAD to be brought over using the new process.
That would be very impolite. :-)
I'm not sure this transition *can* be a "polite" process if it's going to work. That said, I'm open to suggestions.
Let me get this straight... you will be throwing all of my post-1.34 changes away with the transition? What are the expected benefits of this move?