9 Jan
2012
9 Jan
'12
5:36 p.m.
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> wrote:
Note that Boost.Context has a much more comprehensive set of backends: while Boost.Coroutine only had a Linux x86 asm backend and relied on fibers or makecontext for portability,
I"m a window ms user and I found this unsatisfactory so I re-implemented the context switch in inline assembly. This had the effect of making the library header only. Is it really necessary that Boost.Context be a compiled library? Robert Ramey