Re: [boost] [result_of] now uses decltype on release branch

<eric@boostpro.com> wrote:

We might also point out that the idiom of specializing boost::result_of to get the right answer for nullary function objects is no longer required, and should be conditioned on BOOST_RESULT_OF_USE_DECLTYPE.

And another consequence of this change is that the following code breaks with decltype-based result_of for a non-nullary function object F template <typename F> struct FuncWrapper { typename boost::result_of<F()>::type operator()(); /* ... */ }; as described in [Part 2 of 3] of my reply to Daniel. Regards, Michel