10 Mar
2005
10 Mar
'05
9:35 a.m.
Peter Dimov wrote:
Do not give much weight to the opinion of the committee, either. The resolution of the hash<string> issue follows the path of the least resistance.
A typical comittee then?
Nobody uses nonstandard character traits. They are fundamentally broken for a variety of reasons. Their only purpose is to generate discussions such as this one. ;-)
But if this will make you feel better, define the overload as taking basic_string<Ch, char_traits<Ch>, A>. Nobody will spot the difference.
Oh, people on this list will. ;) You're probably right, and I'm sure it wouldn't be long before someone asked for support for that.