
14 Jul
2005
14 Jul
'05
6:59 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> writes:
You could also do
BOOST_WORKADOUND(GCC, LESS(3,2,3)) BOOST_WORKADOUND(GCC, LESS_EQ(3,2,3)) BOOST_WORKADOUND(GCC, TESTED_AT(3,2,3)) ...
Ick; why use a name to stand in for the operator when we can use the operator directly?
For uniform treatment of comparisons and TESTED_AT. Maybe there's some other way to do the same thing. Jonathan