20 Mar
2017
20 Mar
'17
5:13 p.m.
Robert Ramey wrote:
This would effectively be the Boost Incubator version 2 - and there is nothing wrong with that. I could declare victory and retire the inclubator. Accepting a library would simply be a question of changing it's name or moving from the "Boost Submissions" super project to the "Boost" super project.
No, you misunderstood, this is not what I proposed. My suggestion was far less ambitious, it was just to use a "dummy" repository under boostorg as an issue list to track the submissions. You misunderstanding however is not at all a bad idea in its own right. We should consider that too.