19 May
2005
19 May
'05
3:32 p.m.
Douglas Gregor wrote:
On May 19, 2005, at 2:21 AM, Martin Wille wrote:
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
I'm now testing the hypothesis that the problem is std::rand behaving badly on these platforms. I've switched to Boost.Random, and have left just one of the problem tests, newline_test.cpp, uncommented.
newline_test passes now (intel 8.1/Linux) taking only 1.2 seconds here when I run it manually.
Works on gcc-3_3-darwin, too. Thanks Jonathan!
No problem -- I'm glad it turned out to be something simple. Jonathan