Dear all, I will soon start to write some more documentation for the indirect container library (formerly called the smart container library). Before I start on that I would like to get a vote on the preferred naming of 1. the library itself 2. library classes Ad 1: library name: -------------------- Boost.Indirect Cotainer was suggested by Joaquin. It sounds reasonable to me. I don't have any alternatives, but suggestions are welcome. Ad 2: library classes: --------------------- The library currently consists of the following major classes in namespace boost: ptr_array ptr_vector ptr_list ptr_deque ptr_set ptr_multiset ptr_map ptr_multimap ptr_sequence_adapter ptr_set_adapter ptr_multiset_adapter ptr_map_adapter ptr_multimap_adapter Should these names persist? Or should we go for something like indirect_array, indirect_vector etc? br -Thorsten