John Maddock wrote:
Thanks for proofing the docs, I'll fix all those issues you spotted.
I suppose you're not going to completely fix what I wrote about boost::hash in TR1. I was unclear about this section. What I was trying to say is that a documentation of Boost.Hash should be changed. TR1 should just emphasize major differences and have a link. Let's redirect Boost.Hash issues to Daniel James: 1. Original post http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2005/09/94385.php 2. Adding new has_value may have side effects, for example, (a) hash<T> may compile for not customized type T although T doesn't necesarily have properly defined equality function; or (b) it may introduce overload resolution ambiguities, in worst case, hash<type_from_6_3_3_1> may stop working. 3. A link to books.hpp leads to books.cpp (note h and c) http://www.boost.org/doc/html/hash/custom.html. Currently, I can't access cvs and fix it myself. -- Alexander Nasonov