Re: [boost] Boost.Buffers: network-agnostic buffer types and algorithms

On 2/2/23 1:57 PM, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost wrote:

Should the code responsible for the serialization of Boost.Optional be part of Boost.Serialization or Boost.Optional? But we will certainly not solve it by introducing yet another library. There are other ways to solve it, say, through optional headers.

This question comes up all the time and had never been been "solved" to everyone's satisfaction.

Regards, &rzej;

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost