6 Apr
2010
6 Apr
'10
2:05 p.m.
Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
Mind you, I'm not trying to convince anyone to the creation of a new Boost.Patterns library (although I'd really like to do that if possible), instead I'd like to ask you if there's a viable GSoC proposal in this post, one that one day might turn into a useful part of boost.
I suppose there could be, but I'm not really convinced by the patterns you're proposing. I'd be more interested in tools and utilities that factor the common idioms as mixins or macros than in the GoF patterns.