21 May
2014
21 May
'14
12:49 p.m.
On 21 May 2014 at 15:45, Peter Dimov wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Those who want Boost to provide a bridge between C++03 and C++11 because they can't use C+11 should stick to "Legacy Boost" (whether that's v1.x or some fork that goes into maintenance mode) and not hold back interesting new development.
I don't understand. Who are those hypothetical people holding back interesting new development?
Start reading at: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/c-11-td4648532.html Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/