8 Jul
2007
8 Jul
'07
7:22 p.m.
On 07/08/2007 09:42 AM, Eric Niebler wrote: [snip]
now that it can't really know, so I should break this up into separate construct<> and pod_construct<> transforms.
Thanks Eric. I starting looking for some typedef in proto::expr and tried "overriding" the: typedef expr proto_derived_expr; in proto::expr<> with: typedef wrap proto_derived_expr; in wrap, but that didn't work. I was planning on looking further; however, I guess I'd better just wait for a revised construct<>. Your last message just saved me, probably, a lot of time. Thanks again. Could you let me know when the revised construct<> is ready? TIA. -Larry