1 Dec
2016
1 Dec
'16
4:43 p.m.
On 12/1/16 6:05 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. wrote:
Hmmm - HPX looks interesting, but it hasn't been submitted to boost and I haven't heard of any plans to do so. <
I make take that statement the wrong way - but it reads to me a bit like "if it isn't part of boost, then it doesn't exist".
I meant more like: "Can Boost you an async library? If so, here is a proposal for one." I don't know if the existence of some other library makes it uninteresting to consider this proposal.
My understanding is that HPX isn't ever going to be part of boost, though it does use quite a lot of it.
JB
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost