Am Mi., 29. Aug. 2018 um 17:15 Uhr schrieb Michael Caisse via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org>:
On 8/29/18 08:12, Edward Diener via Boost wrote:
On 8/29/2018 10:53 AM, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:
The fact is that users of boost use compilers with differing levels of C++ standard conformance. This creates a number of problems including (but probably not limited to)
<snip>
This would make everyone's life easier.
Forcing end-users to build Boost themselves is not user friendly.
The users of Boost are developers. They should be building Boost for their target needs.
I like Edwards proposal. However, not all Boost users are C++ experts, especially those who want to use 'higher-level' boost libraries such as GIL. Comparing Boost's installation processes with Qt's one, many users do not want to be concerned with cloning/compiling/linking issues.
-- Michael Caisse Ciere Consulting ciere.com
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost