Hi Joachim, Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
Dear developers,
the Interval Template Library is now in a state where I think it does conform the requirements and guidelines for boost libraries fairly well.
I'm working with CodeWarrior version 9.x (yep I'm stuck with this): The trailing ';'s on member function definitions cause warnings in boost\itl\type_traits\unon.hpp template <> inline std::string unon<std::string>::value() { return std::string(" "); }; template <class Type> inline Type unon<Type>::value() { return succ(neutron<Type>::value()); }; Also Ambiguous use of partial specialization Errors in is_combinable.hpp for the typedef's in: template<class Type> struct is_interval_set_derivative<Type, typename Type::interval_type> { typedef is_interval_set_derivative<Type, typename Type::interval_type> type; BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = (is_interval_container<Type>::value)); }; template<class Type> struct is_interval_map_derivative<Type, typename Type::interval_mapping_type> { typedef is_interval_map_derivative<Type, typename Type::interval_mapping_type> type; BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = (is_interval_container<Type>::value)); }; template<class Type> struct is_interval_map_derivative<Type, typename Type::value_type> { typedef is_interval_map_derivative<Type, typename Type::value_type> type; BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = (is_interval_container<Type>::value)); }; Any thoughts on fixing these? Thanks, Jeff