12 Nov
2014
12 Nov
'14
5:06 p.m.
Petr Machata wrote:
::type > ( px[ i ] ); ... Actually, array_fail_array_access.cpp fails with this patch (as in, it compiles successfully, which is a failure). Arguably it's not a big deal
return static_cast< typename boost::detail::sp_array_access< T that the subscription operator exists if it doesn't actually do anything. But I expect the base class variant would keep the test failing. Let me know what you think.
I've "fixed" the test instead (on develop).