12 Mar
2008
12 Mar
'08
9:53 p.m.
AMDG Max Motovilov wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
If the original posting there isn't a true crossproduct view, I would be very grateful if you'd replace it with your own solution.
I think we've settled that the solution to the book problem is a correct crossproduct view for 2 sequences. Mine is set up to handle any number of sequences from 0 to n but it is certainly bad illustrative material as it's much more convoluted.
The two are not the equivalent. Given vector_c<int, 0, 1> and vector_c<int, 2, 3> the book solution generates the equivalent of vector<vector<pair<0, 2>, pair<0, 3> >, vector<pair<1, 2>, pair<1, 3> > > while your solution flattens the result. In Christ, Steven Watanabe