
29 Nov
2008
29 Nov
'08
4:41 a.m.
on Mon Nov 24 2008, Andreas Klein <klein-AT-cage.UGent.be> wrote:
It seams that this resolves the bug. But I can not explain why. I tested the code with the intel compiler and it works fine for both implementations. So it seams that it is a gcc bug, that the first solution do not work. What happens here?
Looks like you should try a few different optimizer settings with GCC and then inspect the generated assembly code. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com