9 Jan
2006
9 Jan
'06
2:45 a.m.
"Jeff Garland" <jeff@crystalclearsoftware.com> writes:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:50:14 -0500, Douglas Gregor wrote
On Jan 8, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
I could just mark all the failures as expected, but if no one cares anymore then we ought to stop testing 2.95.3, free up the testing resources and stop pestering Boost developers about 2.95.3 failures.
Seems like a good idea. Let's get rid of 2.95.3.
I concur -- it's time to drop support for this old thing.
Again I have to ask: what does it mean for Boost to support (or not) a particular compiler? Maybe we ought to be instituting a firmer notion of what "supported" means. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com