"Loïc Joly" wrote: Pavel Vozenilek a écrit :
I think we may be talking about two different use cases for test system:
* one is to run them overnight, do a complete coverage, record everything, recover after errors
* other is quick and dirty tool to test recently changed code directly from IDE, without need to touch makefiles or whatever else.
I'd like to introduce yet another scenario for boost::test: * once a bug has been found, it is possible to exercise the test case that exhibits the bug, and this test case only, until the bug is corrected. ------------- There could be unwanted interdependencies between tests. I use random sorting of the tests before run with ability to specify the seed manually in case of such problem. (I happens only /very/ seldom I need it.) /Pavel