8 Apr
2011
8 Apr
'11
11:50 a.m.
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Sebastian Nowozin <nowozin <at> gmail.com> writes:
This does not do the job, as BOOST_CHECK_SMALL(std::fabs(first - second), 1.0e-3) will be about as useful as BOOST_CHECK(std::fabs(first - second) <= 1.0e-3)
It is not useful because in case this check fails I do not get to see the original values of both 'first' and 'second', but only their difference.
That's what you get for using suboptimal testing approach ;)
Can you give an example or reference on a more optimal approach? Thanks, Jeff