Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?

Richard writes:

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]

boost <at> lists.boost.org spake the secret code <1370771537.69686.YahooMailNeo <at> web172406.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> thusly:

...

[...] In addition, there is symbol-injection via a using directive in Boost.Test which, although needed by Boost.Test, seems to cause the ambiguity.

Looking at trunk, the using directive brings the symbols into namespace ::boost::unit_test, not ::boost.

Exactly. There was one or two places where unit_test was injected into boost, but these are cleared for some time now. Gennadiy