Helge Bahmann wrote:
Hi folks,
from the comments to Boost.Lockfree I understand that you consider a non-reviewed Boost.Atomic as a "blocker"? I apologize that I have not pushed forward for review (considering that "it just works for me", and considering the length of the review queue...)
It's not really a queue, and I believe Atomic should jump in at the front.
, but if you consider it blocking please just let me know what I would need to do to clear the path.
Get a review manager.
What I will do shortly is to provide and uptodate package containing several fixes, several contributed by others (they are in the repo, but not in any release archive) as well as some missing bits to more closely match latest C++0X draft.
The big sore point is still support for the various flavours of VC -- I know that there are (especially older) versions for which it is not working, but I am lacking test systems, so if you are affected please let me know and I will do my best to resolve the issues.
Sorry, I can't help with VC. The thing that I believe is missing is tests. Do you have any thoughts about that? Regards, Phil.