On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
At Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:56:19 +0800, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
Actually, I'd +2 if you said a review should be open until the library gets into the main distribution. And even after that, reviewing the quality of the library should be on-going and shouldn't stop at the point of inclusion into Boost. ;)
_That_ is a really cool idea.
I liked too. How many times I wanted to review a library, but didn't find any time in the two or three weeks they were being reviewed. Sometimes these libraries are in the review queue for much longer than that, and a review could've been possible before or even after.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida