19 Mar
2005
19 Mar
'05
12:04 a.m.
"Miro Jurisic" <macdev@meeroh.org> wrote in message news:macdev-831075.13162418032005@sea.gmane.org... | I believe that the question of why basic_string is not a suitable Unicode | abstraction has been answered adequately in this thread, but to summarize: | numerous basic_string methods would allow the client to violate invariants set | by the Unicode standard. the basic_string interface isn't exactly the best interface invented, so I don't consider this important...sorry I brought that up. Would boost.string algorithm work with unicode strings or what would it take for that support (this I do think is important). -Thorsten