Is it reasonable to extend the logic to check for 3D shapes (i.e., spheres instead of circles, etc.)? It certainly would be a reasonable strategy to get the 2D work you have into the library and treat 3D as a later extension. Kind regards, Richard Newman rodolfo@rodsoft.org wrote:
Hi, is there any interest on a geomery library? It has primitives like point, rectangle, circle, triangle, polygon, and functions that operates on them like intersect, union, test if a point is inside, etc. I have some classes that I've built to use in my projects and would like to get it into boost, for everyone's profit.
Sorry if there's already another library trying to get into boost with these characteristics. At least I didn't find it in the sandbox.
Regards, Rodolfo Lima
_______________________________________________________ Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora! http://br.acesso.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost