Niall Douglas wrote:
To solve the optics problem with the SC, I have also in the past asked for a formal decision tracking website. Some debate occurred about which project management software to use so decisions being pondered supreme-court-like by the SC could be subscribed to by interested parties. No consensus was arrived at on which software to use, so nothing happened.
Surely it doesn't need "project management software". It just needs that the section called "Recent resolutions" at https://sites.google.com/a/boost.org/steering/ gets updated to include some mention of the CMake decision. (That is the official page, right?) I note also that the SC mailing list archive at https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/boost-steering has no mention of CMake that I can see. So if this were all handled by some sort of project management software where people could subscribe to see this discussion, what discussion would they see? (Again, is that the official list? Why are these things hosted by Google, rather than by Boost?) Regards, Phil.