15 Nov
2011
15 Nov
'11
6:31 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1@gmail.com>wrote: [...]
Review Managers, I am not really trading, I vote YES for the Boost.Local and just request the motivation section in the documentation. I think the situation of Boost.Local is similar to that of Boost.Move, and the latter was accepted into Boost. Also, having a library in Boost whose primary purpose is to serve as the foundation for other Boost libraries is not a precedent (I mean Boost.Proto and now Boost.Context).
Duly noted. - Boost.Local Review Manager aka Jeff