8 Feb
2006
8 Feb
'06
7:38 a.m.
Gennadiy Rozental wrote: [snip]
Don't I need to define BOOST_TEST_MAIN in this case? Is this as intended? I'm using the latest cvs and UTF as a static library.
The only purpose of BOOST_TEST_MAIN for regular build is to define this init function. So obviously this is working.
For me, BOOST_TEST_MAIN sounds like one is defining a "main" function. I guess this relates to the naming issue we discussed earlier. I saw your posting about BOOST_TEST_MODULE, which sounds better. // Johan