Re: [boost] Is there interest in portable integer overflow detection, with policy based handling?

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:04 AM, John Bytheway <jbytheway+boost@gmail.com>wrote:

Would you be open to providing assembly implementations to supplement the existing portable implementation if there was demand and they were faster?

I am certainly open to specializing the implementation for specific

platforms, once the portable implementation gains support and is approved for Boost. Adding optimizations for specific platoforms does not seem outside the goals of the Boost, provided a fully portable implementation exists. Thank you, Ben Robinson

John Bytheway

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost