On 15/09/2012 2:16 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
Lorenzo, thanks for volunteering but the design and implementation is far more complex than the extract from the doc. If we want it to be efficient, it shouldn't use boost.function, boost/multi_index/detail/scope_guard.hpp should be a good staring point. I see. Then (speaking personally) it might make sense for it to exist in a lib as its impl is not trivial due to the optimization efforts. However, I probably won't have time to add this feature to Scope Exit...
Ahhhh! The needed class is already part of scope exit. Just add a dismiss function, take it out of aux/detail and I WILL BE YOUR UNCLE, forget about Bob. Forget the optimization. Boost Scope.Exit doesn't use any of these tricks right? It's already using a boost function. Lorenzo my man, just add it. Sohail