6 Feb
2011
6 Feb
'11
10:58 p.m.
On 2/6/2011 4:18 PM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
Edward Diener<eldiener<at> tropicsoft.com> writes:
On 2/6/2011 3:07 PM, Daniel Larimer wrote:
I recently ran across the unofficial Boost Interface Library (http://www.coderage.com/interfaces),
How are is an interface any different than a C++ abstract class ?
As the concept is defined by the aforementioned library, interfaces allow for dynamic duck typing.
It is not your problem but I did not get much of an understanding from the OP's original description of what advantages his implementation has over using C++ abstract classes to define interfaces. In other words what duck typing has to offer in terms of use which makes it better.