"Lars Viklund" <zao@acc.umu.se> wrote in message news:20101105230105.GA24771@hatchepsut.acc.umu.se...
r66407 has the correct pass/failed-as-expected results on VisualAge. All three test suites of program_options, signals and signals2 pass.
I ran the same three suites on Sun as well, just to cover all bases.
On 5.10, signals and signals2 pass completely, except for the usual spurious mutex_test failure as indicated in the regression matrix.
program_options on 5.9 fails to compile parsers.o in a similar manner to the one reported in the regular trunk test matrix, so it's most probably not a Function fault (log attached).
Hooray!
Great! :-) If you are interested and have a project with relatively significant boost::function usage I'd love to hear your results...the same advice/hints I gave to Hartmut apply... Additionally, if you would like to squeeze a little extra out of your compilers you might want to provide the appropriate sections in the detail/platform_specifics.hpp file ;) ps. do you perhaps know where is the list of compilers officially supported by Boost (I know I've seen it but can't remember the location)..? -- "What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate." Neil Postman