6 Jun
2005
6 Jun
'05
3:51 a.m.
Dave Harris wrote:
In-Reply-To: <20050601173608.GA77601@compsoc.man.ac.uk> cow@compsoc.man.ac.uk (Jonathan Wakely) wrote (abridged):
Actually, it's moot because it's been semi-standardised in TR1, not because you now understand the design goals ;)
Really? My impression was that TR1 had not been reviewed in detail. When the hashing library was submitted to boost, I understood it to be the same as TR1 yet we found several problems with it. We did not blindly accept it just because it was in TR1.
Work on TR1 is finished. The hash library is not part of TR1. Jonathan