7 May
2004
7 May
'04
9:31 a.m.
"Pavol Droba" <droba@topmail.sk> wrote in message news:20040507065316.GC20346@lenin.felcer.sk... | Would it make sense to move iterator_range to this library as well? | (given the fact it was requested to be separated from the string algo lib | during the review) yes, I was about to ask about that :-) | After all, it is a minimal encapsulation of the Range concept. If | the library will not be only about the traits, it might be natural to | put it there. yes. How about calling it range<> then? I think back then I suggested to call it range<>, but iterator_range was chosen because it was a range of iterators. br Thorsten