2 Dec
2006
2 Dec
'06
1:12 a.m.
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Howard Hinnant
I wouldn't really need the extra indirection that seems to be implied there but that's a step in the right direction.
<nod> Agreed. The indirection is in there really only because you said "C". The deleter type can easily be a C++ class type which can then do anything you want.
Yes, it turns out I read your code wrong. I was thinking that was the signature for a something that would construct a tr1::function eventually. Been so long since I mucked around with function pointers :) Thankfully.