Re: [boost] [logging] Interest check on logging library.

Andrey Semashev wrote:

Jason Wagner wrote: [...]

Sorry, couldn't resist. I think, my library fits these requirements quite well. Why would you start your own implementation from scratch? Is there something that doesn't suit you in my implementation?

If I recall your library requires a lib to be linked in. That's a deal breaker for me. This library seems to move away from that. What I really need is captured in my review of John Torjo's second library <http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/02/133462.php> I'd be interested if either library can support this minimal use case. Jamie