12 Sep
2010
12 Sep
'10
12:57 a.m.
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Gordon Woodhull <gordon@woodhull.com> wrote:
Substituting for Jeff Garland, I am pleased to present the results from the constrained_value review.
Gordon, Many thanks for taking this on and for the thorough report. However, a critical piece of information seems to be missing (or buried so I can't find it): is the library accepted? Conditionally or unconditionally? Thanks, -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com