Hi Olivier, ----- Original Message ----- From: <k-oli@gmx.de> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 5:51 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Future & review of C++0x accepted librariesimplementations
Am Donnerstag, 20. November 2008 15:37:10 schrieb vicente.botet:
Hi,
The Anthony Future + Packaged task proposals have been adopted by the C++ Standard.
good you post a link to this information, please.
Done by Anthony.
Is there a sense to review both Futures libraries together? Can we accept the Braddock library if it not conforms to the standard?
That's the question - Braddocks Future library has more features (callback functionality).
Yes it have more but also less.
BTW, the threadpool library uses Braddock Future library.
I can easily exchange the future implementation - chaining tasks and lazy task evaluation will not be available with the lib from Anthony.
As I was not aware of that until yesterday, I though that every body in Boost should know that posting a specific post. My post was more to signal this fact to you in order you take the measures you consider the better.