14 Jun
2006
14 Jun
'06
3:38 a.m.
"Andy Little" <andy@servocomm.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
Andy has indeed graciously accepted criticism of the documentation, for which I commend him.
Your criticism mainly concerned the C++ Concepts section of the documentation for PQS. What might help is some examples of what you consider good C++ Concept documentation.
<snip> Sorry about the overquoting in my other reply to this message; it was user error in my mailer :( -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com