Joel de Guzman <joel <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
Yep. Both has its uses. I agree.
I believe Alexander's code accepts only polymorphic functions.
That's right. It's like boost::function except that it can have more than one overload: typedef mpl::list<int (int), double(double)> sigs; multi_function<sigs> f = _1 + 1; f(0); f(0.0);
So, you can also use 'overloads' to gather the monomorphic functions and feed that to Alexander's.
Yes. It would add another level of indirection, though.
Cool stuff Alexander! I'd like to use dynamic_any in the lisp/scheme interpreter I'll be writing as an example for spirit2.
Are you planning to use only function_call operation or all operations? If the latter, I'm not familiar with values in scheme/lisp to say whether dynamic_any fits or not. -- Alexander