10 Apr
2010
10 Apr
'10
3:49 p.m.
On 10 April 2010 10:45, Daniel Trebbien <dtrebbien@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 and one, minor suggestion: why not name `end_message` simply `end`? I am of the opinion that naming should follow the language's standard library conventions closely. And, as the STL uses short, concise member function names, it is best to mimic this.
If you intend on shortening the name of this function (and I don't feel strongly about it one way or the other), I'd say pick a different word, such as finish(). end() has too many connotations connected with the STL. -- Nevin Liber <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com> (847) 691-1404