16 Jan
2012
16 Jan
'12
2:05 p.m.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mostafa <mostafa_working_away@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:53:24 -0800, Lorenzo Caminiti <lorcaminiti@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all,
During Boost.Local review, it was proposed to move the overload template out of Local and in Boost.Functional. What would the best name for it?
1) boost::overload_function (my preference) 2) boost::overloaded_function 3) boost::function_overload 4) boost::functional::overload (Boost.Functional seems to use boost:: directly and not boost::functional-- to mimic C++11 <functional>).
What about boost::multi_function?
IMO, overload (somewhere) is a good name because it expresses the fact that the resulting functor overloads all the specified functors. Thanks. --Lorenzo