I'm relatively new to the Boost community, but I would be happy to be a review manager for PFR, especially if it would otherwise stagnate on the review queue.
I'm not sure, but I think that a review manager must have an accepted Boost library. If that have changed, I'd glad to have you as a review manager!
I think PFR is very intersting, and worthy of a Boost review. I spent 2 or 3 hours studying the implementation a couple of months ago,
For what it's worth, I predict that the main point of contention during
It has changed a lot in a last few weeks. Now it has some C++17 features that do not rely on UB and do not have previous limitations. the
review will be the fact that it ultimately relies on undefined behavior to work. Before scheduling the review, I would prefer for the documentation to include an explanation of where the magic (and the UB) actually occurs in the code.
There is a note in the docs on UB. Do I need to write more details?
Thanks, Barrett
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Best regards, Antony Polukhin