25 Mar
2006
25 Mar
'06
8:03 p.m.
Neal Becker wrote:
Roland Schwarz wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
1. Generic data types instead of hard-coded 'double'
Hmm, generic? int's won't make any sense would they? perhaps double or float but what else?
I was thinking of any float-like type, but that's an interesting question. I'm afraid I don't have enough expertise to answer it - do any of these algorithms make sense for other numeric fields, (e.g., finite fields)?
Rational numbers? -Jason