Re: [boost] Formal Review Retrospective

Darryl Green wrote:

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024, 11:17 am Peter Dimov via Boost, wrote:

...

...

Do note that this proposed "retrospective" took place anyway. The

Vinnie Falco wrote: proposal

...

would just make it a bit more formal.

There's no need to make it more formal. If people want to discuss it, they will.

Will they? I still feel like I would be an interloper in these discussions even if I do belatedly look at slack because some hint was given that there was something going on there? I am a regular slack (the platform, not cpplang workspace) user but not in a context where just looking to see what channels have been created and adding my 5c with in them would be considered acceptable. You can take that, in itself, as feedback re a goal I've seen stated somewhere; to increase and extend engagement in Boost in general and reviews in particular.

I don't think that any of this will be fixed if we mandate "retrospective" post-review threads.