Re: [boost] different matrix library?

DE wrote: [snip]

if we lived in ideal world it'll be the very approach however the first sentence on boost homepage states that

...

Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries. i don't think blas implementations such that you say will be ever portable (and i actually wonder how the threading was made portable??)

Thanks :-) I'm not sure, but portable may not mean "without dependencies of any other code whatsoever". There's also Boost.Python, Boost.MPI, Boost.Filesystem, Boost.Asio, etc., which all depend on some external API.

i focus on delivering a portable generic self-contained solution without dependancies on third-party entities

Interesting. Have you looked at MTL4? Cheers, Rutger