24 Jul
2008
24 Jul
'08
4:54 a.m.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Joel de Guzman <joel@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
Mathias Gaunard wrote:
Why not simply take 2.0?
[snip]
Yep. That's what I've been doing.
That's odd, should there be an alternative "standalone" Phoenix 2.0 package in the project's Sourceforge downloads page to make this a little simpler? :D It seems more and more people are getting more and more excited with Phoenix 2 and can't/won't wait to get it reviewed before using it, it just seems like the logical thing to do at this time... ;-) -- Dean Michael C. Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc.